Basic Human Common Sense - Part 2
For the second time in the past week, there has been another news item about a local "parent" locking their child (children), in an automobile, on a hot sunny day. Her two kids didn't die. They were treated by the EMT's and are fine. However, this woman was immediately charged with child neglect. The incident that occured earlier in the week, where the child died, the parent wasn't charged with any crime.
Late breaking news.....
As I wrote earlier in the week, a "parent" forgot his child was in the car, on a hot summer day. He went into work and, as the police report states, "an extended amount of time" later, he returned to his car to find his child had died.
There was a news conference this morning. The "parent" in this incident is an associate pastor at a local baptist church. He apparently "forgot" the child was in the car, as he went to perform his associate patoral duties in the church. Autopsy reports today state conclusively, the child died of hyperthermia. The associate pastor has not been charged with any child neglect, because the police have determined there wasn't any "intent" for neglect. The police, since there was a death and no charge, have rolled the decision over to the District Attorney. It will be up to a Judge to make the decision.
Several days later, a woman left her two kids in a car (ages 8 and 3) in a car, in a parkinglot, on a hot summer day, for a quick run into Wal-mart. A passerby noticed the kids in the car, called police, the police arrived as well as the EMT's, and the children were rescued. The children were deemed "hot" by the EMT's, but otherwise ok. An hour later, the "parent" returns to her car and she is immediately cuffed and charged with child neglect.
Apparently "intent" precludes "neglect".
So, let me see if I've got this straight. A woman, who intentionally locks her children in the car, the children survive, and she is charged with child negligence. Whereas, another individual, who "forgets" their child is in the car, the child dies, and this individual is not charged with anything because there was no "intent"?
The goo is dripping from my ears.
Negligence is negligence, regardless of intent. I have heard the analogy for this particular news item, what if you or I were driving down the road coming up to a red light and we accidentally step on the gas instead of the brake, an accident ensues and you or I kill someone. We wouldn't be charged with negligent homicide? Hell yes we would! Whether there was intent or not. It would prove that you and I are no more worthy to drive a car as these "parents" are to have a child under their care!
God, I'm so pissed!
LLS
Reference:
The Mac Watson Show: http://1140wrva.com/main.html
Local news item(s): http://www.nbc12.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WWBT%2FMGArticle%2FWBT_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031777133135
http://www.nbc12.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WWBT%2FMGArticle%2FWBT_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031777144999&path=!news!archive